Molding Introduction
Introduction
Altair Manufacturing solver - Injection Molding, is used for simulating the injection molding process. The Molding interface in SimLab provides an interface to this solver. It is used for setting up model for standard simulation studies. In addition, it can also be used for advanced, and atypical models and simulations for injection molding for many what-if and process fine tuning studies. When simulating the molding process, not every detail from the process at the shop-floor is translated into the simulation environment. Process items like "cushion" and "back pressure" are not a part of the simulation setup as they are designed to account for effects which are not part of the simulation assumptions. There are a great many physical results from the process of injecting a polymer through a mold, and while several may be very common to evaluate, some are less common, and others even rare. With all the possible machine control parameters used to set a molding process on the shop floor, it is important to keep in mind that we are processing a polymer and that evaluating the flow from the view of the polymer material is actually easier and more effective.Overview of Injection Molding Process
Injection molding is one of the most common processes used for the production of polymer parts. This is a cyclic process and often used with thermoplastic polymers. A polymer in the form of pellets is mixed with other additives, then heated to a melt state, and finally pressurized in a single screw extruder. This pressurized polymer melt is injected into the mold at a high flow rate to fill the mold cavities. These cavities are made in the form of the final part accounting for the shrinkage. Then the mold is cooled and the part is ejected from the mold as soon as it is stable enough for ejection. This is a cyclic process and this sequence repeats. These stages can be listed as
- Mold closes and a new cycle begins
-
Filling Stage:
-
1st Stage - velocity-controlled injection (until the mold fills approximately to 80%)
-
2nd Stage - pressure-controlled injection (in industry called as packing, both filling and packing happen in this stage)
-
-
Packing Stage:
-
In the industry, this stage is called holding as the pressure at the inlet is held until the gates are frozen. Once the cavity is full, the gates are still molten and pressure is further applied to account for the volume of shrinking polymer in the cavities. This packing of additional material stops when gates are frozen. In simulation, this stage is called packing.
-
- Cooling Stage:
- The mold is rapidly cooled until the part reaches a safe ejection temperature. For thick parts, the center of those thick regions may still not be frozen completely.
- Mold opens and the part is ejected
- Warpage:
- Part continues to cool outside the mold and may warp due to thermal stresses and few other reasons.
Please watch this video for a quick and good introduction to the injection molding process
Key Process Variables
There are four primary process variables that control the injection process. They are:
-
Plastic Flow Rate,
- Polymer Melt Temperature,
-
Plastic Pressure, and
- Cooling Rate
The words "polymer" (technically accurate) and "plastic" (commonly used) are used interchangeably in this document. These four factors are used to control the molding process. From the simulation point of view, different phases of the injection molding processes are modeled using system of equations derived from the laws of conservation of mass, momentum, and energy; together with the material model and the equation of state. This enables to numerically study the effects of these four and other process variables on the manufacturing process.
The effective shear rate controls the viscosity of the molten polymer. Thermoplastic polymers are shear thinning, so the faster they are made to flow, higher will be the shear rates and the lower their apparent viscosity. Additionally, the sensitivity to temperature will also dramatically decrease with increasing shear rate. Some materials, like PMMA (Acrylic) or PVC, are shear sensitive so part of a polymer's characterization is a "maximum shear limit." When the shear rate that the melt experiences exceeds this limit, it can be expected that defects will likely be observed on the molded parts. As a polymer is made to flow fast, the shear region where the thinning occurs will diminish. The polymer in the center of the flow will move more like a plug than the laminar flow of a Newtonian fluid.The polymer melt temperature needs to be within a range where the polymer can be made to flow reasonably easily, but is still below the specific material's degradation temperature. Each material has a "no flow" and "degradation" temperature. The "no flow" temperature is not the glass transition temperature, but rather the temperature at which the polymer ceases to flow with an applied pressure. Often, this value much higher than the glass transition temperature. The degradation temperature is tested in the lab with DSC and is the temperature at which the polymer chains break and the physical properties of the melt are expected to be materially altered.
Given the generally high viscosity of polymers, one of the difficult parameters to control is the plastic pressure throughout the cavity in the mold. The more even the pressure, the more consistent the shrink and warp will generally be, aside from other effects. Molecular orientation, and fiber direction also play a significant role in post-mold shrink and warp, but those are controlled by the cavity design, flow patterns, and fill rate. As a process variable, plastic pressure, and the minimizing of its gradient, play a key role in shot-to-shot consistency.
The cooling rate determines the cycle time. Aside from scrap, one of the most heavily reviewed and scrutinized elements of part cost is the cycle time. All manufacturers seek to reduce overhead cost by minimizing the "in-process" time, cycle time in this case. It is, again apart from scrap, the most costly element in the manufacture of any product. If one can cut 10% off of the cycle time of a part, then that's 10% of the cost of the machines and labor to make those parts and it opens up more time for other products to be made in the same machines. The degree to which the cooling rate is even between the two halved of the mold will impact the post-mold warping of those parts. It should also be noted that cold molds that "freeze-in" the stretch of the polymer from molding will creep over time and eventually release that stress. One need only look as far as extruded floor runner in most public buildings to see how this works. Also, downstream processes like painting or assembly can heat the polymer and release those stresses, causing warp to manifest after the product was inspected at the molding press and approved for sale, or subsequent processing. The cooling rate is affected by the coolant used, the design of the cooling system in the mold, the material the mold is made from, and the temperature & flow rate of the coolant as it is pumped through the mold.
Other Factors:
The long chains in polymers will stretch when made to flow and when they are aligned in the direction of flow, they will shrink more in that direction than across it. The faster the polymer flow, the smaller the shear region is and thus the more uniform the shrink will be. Fibers, based on their aspect ratio (L/D, or "length / diameter"), have the greatest effect on the warping of plastic parts. The gross size of the fibers is less important than the aspect ratio, so nano-fiber filled polymers can be expected to see similar warp results to standard fiber filler of the same basic shape and aspect ratio.
Benefits of Injection Molding Simulation
Numerical simulation of the injection molding process helps to increase the process productivity and improve the part quality. It enables an in-depth understanding of the entire process and optimizes it. Through numerical experiments, one can understand the effects of process conditions for successful injection molding. This helps to reduce the mold tryouts and efficiently bring the mold in to production. These simulation also help to identify and eliminate potential defects that may arise in the part. Overall, simulation helps to save time, money, energy, and also reduce waste.
Some Terminology
Press Parameters Vs. Plastic / Physical Parameters
PRESS PARAMETERS | PHYSICAL (PLASTIC) PARAMETERS |
---|---|
Barrel Temperatures (generally 4 zones) | Melt Temperature: Taken from an air shot and a thermometer. |
Hot Runner / Hot Drop Temperatures | Melt Temperature (same as above) |
Transfer Position (linear position on the barrel or sensor in the mold) | Transfer Position (percent volume of shot size to transfer to pressure control) |
Shot Size (linear position on the barrel after melt decompression) | Shot Size (volume of the part(s) + feed system) |
Cushion (material in excess of the mold volume to account for variations) | N/A |
Hydraulic Pressure (PSI or MPa) | Plastic Pressure = (Machine Hydraulic Pressure) (Screw Intensification Ratio) |
Water Temperature |
Mold Surface Temperature (thermometer reading on mold face) Water Temperature can be used in Cooling Analyses |
Water Flow Rate |
Water Flow Rate (cooling analyses only) Reynolds Number |
Water Inlet & Outlet Pressures | Pressure Drop Across Water Circuit |
Excessive Tonnage Response: Tie bars stretch, and mold opens. (FSI) | Pressure is reduced to constrain the clamp force. (non-physical) |
Mold close | N/A |
---|---|
Clamp force applied | Full Clamp Force is assumed |
1st stage injection | Filling |
Transfer (By screw position or sensor) | V/P Switch Over |
2nd stage injection (packing) | Filling under Pressure Control (Until Mold is Full) |
Hold (until the gates are frozen) | Packing Analysis |
Screw return | N/A |
Cooling | Cooling Analysis |
Mold open | N/A |
Eject | N/A |
Post-Mold Warp | Warpage Analysis |