Motivation for Different Urban Models
Radio transmission in urban environments is subject to strong multipath propagation. Characterization of the multipath propagation is performed by means of several empirical models.
Radio transmission in urban environments is subject to strong multipath propagation (see Figure 1). Dominant characteristics in these scenarios are reflection, diffraction, shadowing by discrete obstacles and wave guiding effects in street canyons. To consider these effects in a propagation model, it is necessary to gain knowledge of all dominant propagation paths. These paths depend primarily on the base station antenna height with respect to the surrounding building heights.
For simplification of propagation modeling, several two-dimensional empirical models have been developed under the assumption of over-rooftop propagation as the main propagation mechanism. The model according to Walfisch-Ikegami with extensions from the European research cooperation, or COST 231, is such an analytical approach with empirically based equations and correction factors.
The second group of micro-cellular prediction models are deterministic and use ray-optical methods. They allow a site-specific, three-dimensional path loss and signal spread prediction including impulse response for base station heights below as well as above rooftop level. Hence, a three-dimensional description for the propagation environment including building shape and building heights has to be incorporated. Of course, due to the three-dimensional ray-optical methods, these models require a higher computation effort than the simplified approaches mentioned above. However, we developed a method to accelerate this ray-optical approach by an intelligent preprocessing of the building database which leads to computation times in the range of empirical models.
The described models are generally valid only for flat urban areas. This requires that the standard deviation of the terrain heights is small in comparison to the standard deviation of the building heights in the considered area. If this is not the case, the influence of terrain should be taken into account by adequate extensions of the methods mentioned above.