OS-V: 1215 Damage Initiation and Evolution Study, Single Element Model

A model with two single element components, CHEXA8 and CQUAD4, is subjected to pure shear deformation through the application of the enforced displacement (via the SPCD card).

This example demonstrates how to define damage initiation (two approaches) and energy-based damage evolution in explicit dynamic analysis.
Figure 1. Finite Element Model


Figure 2. Constraints


Figure 3. Applied Shear Deformation


Model Files

Before you begin, copy the file(s) used in this problem to your working directory.

Benchmark Model

The finite element model, as shown in Figure 1, contains one solid CHEXA and one shell CQUAD4 element. The elements are subjected to dynamic, monotonically increasing shear deformation by application of the enforced displacement (via SPCD card) in the X-direction. All translational DOFs of the model are constrained except the top face of the solid element, which is constrained only in the X- and Y-directions. An enforced displacement in the X direction is applied to one face of the CHEXA8 element and an edge of the CQUAD4 element.

In explicit dynamic analysis, damage criterion is defined with the MATF card, where the MATF material identification number is the same as the corresponding MAT1/MATS1. The INIEVO continuation line in MATF is used to define the damage criterion. Additionally, there are two table IDs defined. The first table (DMGINI) defines the damage initiation, and the second table (DMGEVO) defines the damage evolution.

The DMGINI table defines the damage onset, which is related to the equivalent plastic strain (1st column) at the specific stress state (stress triaxiality, 2nd column) at the specific strain rate (3rd column). In pure shear (which is the case currently), stress triaxiality equals 0.0. It is considered good practice to define the lowest strain rate to be 0.0 for proper interpolation/extrapolation of damage onset at different strain rates. In this example, the model is rate independent as the damage onset values are matching at the two strain rates.

In its simplest form, DMGINI describes only a single value, equivalent plastic strain, that defines the damage onset. In this case, the damage onset is independent of the stress triaxiality and strain rate. In this example, both approaches are equivalent as the stress state remains constant. The two ways of defining damage initiation and energy-based damage evolution are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Two Methods of Defining Damage Initiation and Energy-based Damage Evolution with MATF/INIEVO


Damage evolution is specified with the DMGEVO card. In this example, the type of evolution is ENERGY and the shape is EXPONENTIAL. The unit of energy is N/m (stress N/m2 multiplied by the length m). Length is related to the plastic displacement at the ultimate failure minus plastic displacement at the damage onset. Plastic displacement is equivalent to the plastic strain multiplied by the element characteristic length. In general, DMGEVO shows mesh dependency, but in this example the characteristic length equals to 1.0. Therefore, plastic displacement and equivalent plastic strain are mutually the same.

Material

Elastic-plastic Material Properties
Young's modulus
70000
Poisson's ratio
0.33
Density
2.7E-06
Plastic Properties
TABLEG entries for stress strain curve
Strain Stress
0.0 70
0.015 140.0
Yield function criterion
Von Mises
Hardening rule
1 (Isotropic hardening)
Type of strain
1 (Plastic strain used on X-axis)

Results

Von Mises stress versus equivalent plastic strain is shown in Figure 5. NINT = 1000 for NLOUT is used for accurate output. The damage is initiated at the user-specified equivalent plastic strain of 0.015. The area below the stress-strain curve (post damage initiation) matches the user-specified energy value when the characteristic length of the element is 1.0.
Figure 5. Element Stress versus Plastic Strain for MATF Defined with INIEVO