Recognizing variations in space and time, Germano et al. (1991) proposed the
dynamic model to compute the value of rather than specifying it explicitly.
It is implemented by utilizing two filters: a cutoff filter and a test (coarse) cutoff filter .
The subgrid stress tensor with the cutoff filter () is: . Where is the strain rate magnitude.
Figure 1 shows a resolved turbulence region
utilizing Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and a modeled region assuming the subgrid tensor .
The test subgrid stress tensor with the coarse filter () can be written as
where
is the coarse filtered strain rate magnitude.
is the filtered strain rate tensor, using the coarse
cutoff filter.
Figure 2 shows a resolved
LES region and a corresponding subgrid modelled region (T) when the coarse filter is
employed.
Because of the coarse filtering, the test (coarse) subgrid stress tensor should be a summation of the coarse filtered subgrid stress
tensor and the Leonard stress tensor .
where
is the subgrid tensor for the cutoff filter (or grid
filtered), then test filtered.
is the Leonard subgrid stress tensor, representing the
contribution to the subgrid stresses by turbulence length scales smaller than the test
filter but larger than the cutoff filter.
The Leonard subgrid stress tensor can be arranged as
where .
The Leonard subgrid stress tensor can be rewritten as
where .
Since the above equation is overdetermined a minimum
least square error method is used to determine the coefficient .
In order to avoid numerical instabilities associated with the above
equation, as the numerator could become negative, averaging of the error in the minimization
is employed.