Evaluation of the /LOAD/PBLAST option for surface burst blast
waves. This analysis focuses on evaluating the /LOAD/PBLAST keyword by
comparing Radioss results with surface burst experimental data
(Exp_data = 2).
Figure 1. UFC quantities evaluation model schematic for
Ishape =1 Figure 2. UFC quantities evaluation model schematic for
Ishape =2 Figure 3. UFC quantities evaluation model schematic for
Ishape =3 Figure 4. Formula evaluation model
The analysis is carried out using 4 different FE Radioss
models:
Two 2D elements /SHELL with /PROP/TYPE1
(SHELL), with a Rigid Body attached, and correctly positioned
for a given scaled distance, for Ishape
=1.
Three 2D elements /SHELL with /PROP/TYPE1
(SHELL), with a Rigid Body attached, and correctly positioned
for a given scaled distance, for Ishape
=2.
One 2D element /SHELL with /PROP/TYPE1
(SHELL), with a Rigid Body attached, and correctly positioned
for a given scaled distance, for Ishape
=3.
Nineteen 2D elements /SHELL with /PROP/TYPE1
(SHELL), with a Rigid Body attached to all of them, correctly
positioned at the same scaled distance, each rotated successively by an
angle of 10 degrees.
Since the experimental data (UFC charts) use the {cm, g, µs, Mbar} unit system, this
study is conducted using the same unit system.
The surface burst corresponds to a blast wave model characterized by different types
of wave propagation, taking into account ground reflection (as shown in the
animations below):Figure 5. House model for Ishape =1 Figure 6. House model for Ishape =2 Figure 7. House model for Ishape =3
Here the scaled distance (cm/g1/3) is introduced:
Where,
Distance from the center of the detonation charge to the target
(cm)
TNT-equivalent mass (g)
The scaled distance suggests that two charges with the same geometry, explosive
composition, and ambient conditions will generate self-similar blast waves when
their scaled distances match.Figure 8. Equivalence of blast wave
This allows the pressure to be computed from experimental data for a given charge () and a given location ().
The equation used to compute the pressure in /LOAD/PBLAST is the
modified Friedlander equation:
The profile of the modified Friedlander equation at a given location is:Figure 9. Friedlander pressure profile
Where,
The impulses (integral of pressure with respect to time on the interval
of time )
The propagation time of the blast wave from the charge to the
target
In Radioss, the negative phase is ignored and is replaced by a value (defaults to 10-20). In this case
and until the end of this study, the pressure is only described by:
which replaces .
which replaces .
which replaces .
and vanish.
is still the same
Figure 10. Blast wave pressure profile implemented in Radioss
The blast pressure computed in /LOAD/PBLAST is fitted using
experimental data (UFC charts) which are categorized in two quantities:
The incident wave referred to as the “side on” wave (abbreviation: so), , where the captor/surface normal is
perpendicular to the direction of the blast wave.
The reflected wave , where the captor/surface normal points
towards the blast wave.
These two quantities result in the following formula for the pressure applied to the
surface:
Figure 11. Angle schematic
Where, is the angle between the surface normal and the direction
of the detonation point.
This corresponds to the measurement data obtained with the captors (UFC charts).
Previously, was introduced as the integral of the pressure with
respect to time (positive or negative phase). The same process is applied to and , with the impulses denoted by and . In the charts, and are introduced as the impulse divided by ; the same applies to and .Figure 12. Surface burst quantities graph
Model Description
The boundary conditions are represented below:Figure 13. All boundary conditions applied to the shells for the
first three models Figure 14. All boundary conditions applied to the fourth
model
The two models are tested with 2D shell elements using the /PROP/TYPE1
(SHELL) property and the /MAT/LAW1 (ELASTIC)
material, with a rigid body attached. The elements are placed at distance of from the detonation point ( is imposed).
Shell and material properties:
Properties
Value
Density
7.8 g/cm3
Young's modulus
2.1 Mbar
Poisson ratio
0.3
Thickness
1 cm
The first goal is to compare , , , , and from the Radioss outputs
and the UFC charts, for each value of Ishape. To achieve this, is imposed and only is varied. The second goal is to evaluate formula
Equation 3. for every 10 degrees from 0 degrees to 180 degrees for
different values.
Results
Points Considered
The UFC quantities are evaluated for every point listed below. The formula (Equation 3) is evaluated for Points B, D and H and the
Iz option is evaluated for
Points B and H:
Table 1. List of Points Considered
Point
(cm)
(g)
(g/cm1/3)
A
142.866095
500000
1.8
B
190.488126
500000
2.4
C
253.984168
500000
3.2
D
380.976252
500000
4.8
E
555.590368
500000
7
F
793.700526
500000
10
G
1269.92084
500000
16
H
1984.25131
500000
25
I
2936.69195
500000
37
J
3968.50263
500000
50
K
5952.75394
500000
75
L
7937.00526
500000
100
M
9921.25657
500000
125
N
12699.2084
500000
160
O
15874.0105
500000
200
P
20636.2137
500000
260
Q
25398.4168
500000
320
R
31430.5408
500000
396
Ishape = 1
UFC Quantities Evaluation
For each point in the table, , , , and are measured from the pressure profile on the 2D
shell elements located on the ground and above the charge (Figure 1):Figure 15. evaluation Figure 16. evaluation Figure 17. evaluation Figure 18. evaluation Figure 19.
evaluation
The maximum error obtained is 0.45% and the average error across all data is
0.06%.
These errors are due to interpolation between charts data points and the
discretization of the time pressure response.
Formula Evaluation
For point A, F and L, the formula is evaluated every 10 degrees from 0 degree to 180
degrees:
Figure 20. Formula evaluation for point A Figure 21. Formula evaluation for point F Figure 22. Formula evaluation for point L
The average error obtained is 0.08% with a maximum error of 0.26%.
Again, these errors are due to interpolation between charts data points.
Iz Option Evaluation
The Iz option is an option for the
evaluation of :
If Iz = 1, is constant and computed during Starter at
time = 0 and; therefore, is not updated each cycle.
If Iz = 2, is not constant () and; thus is updated for each cycle during Engine
computation only before the wave reaches the surface. After, no update is
done.
To evaluate Iz, a displacement is
imposed from (point C) to (point D) and the detonation is launched after the
displacement.
For Iz = 1, since is constant and is evaluated at time = 0, the pressure () obtained should correspond to , even after the displacement.
For Iz = 2, is updated as at each cycle; therefore, the pressure () obtained should correspond to after the displacement.
Table 2. Iz
Evaluation for Point B
Iz =
expected (Mbar)
Radioss (Mbar)
Error (%)
1
8.70e-4
8.71e-4
0.01%
2
4.27e-4
4.26e-4
0.14%
Ishape = 2
UFC Quantities Evaluation
For each point in the table, , , , and are measured from the pressure profile on the 2D
shell elements located on the ground and above the charge (Figure 2):Figure 23. evaluation Figure 24. evaluation Figure 25. evaluation Figure 26. evaluation Figure 27. evaluation
The maximum error obtained is 0.10% and the average error across all data is
0.02%.
These errors are due to interpolation between charts data points and the
discretization of the time pressure response.
Formula Evaluation
For point A, F and L, the formula is evaluated every 10 degrees from 0 degree to 180
degrees:
Figure 28. Formula evaluation for point A Figure 29. Formula evaluation for point F Figure 30. Formula evaluation for point L
The average error obtained is 0.08% with a maximum error of 0.26%.
Again, these errors are due to interpolation between charts data points.
Iz Option Evaluation
The Iz option is an option for the
evaluation of :
If Iz = 1, is constant and computed during Starter at
time = 0 and; therefore is not updated each cycle.
If Iz = 2, is not constant () and; thus is updated for each cycle during Engine
computation only before the wave reaches the surface. After, no update is
done.
To evaluate Iz, a displacement is
imposed from (point C) to (point D) and the detonation is launched after the
displacement.
For Iz = 1, since is constant and is evaluated at time = 0, the pressure () obtained should correspond to , even after the displacement.
For Iz = 2, is updated as at each cycle, therefore the pressure () obtained should correspond to after the displacement.
Table 3. Iz
Evaluation for Point B
Iz =
expected (Mbar)
Radioss (Mbar)
Error (%)
1
8.70e-4
8.71e-4
0.01%
2
4.27e-4
4.26e-4
0.14%
Ishape = 3
UFC Quantities Evaluation
For each point in the table, , , , and are measured from the pressure profile on the 2D
shell elements located on the ground and above the charge (Figure 3):Figure 31. evaluation Figure 32. evaluation Figure 33. evaluation Figure 34. evaluation Figure 35. evaluation
The maximum error obtained is 0.18% and the average error across all data is
0.02%.
These errors are due to interpolation between charts data points and the
discretization of the time pressure response.
Formula Evaluation
For point A, F and L, the formula is evaluated every 10 degrees from 0 degree to 180
degrees:
Figure 36. Formula evaluation for point A Figure 37. Formula evaluation for point F Figure 38. Formula evaluation for point L
The average error obtained is 0.08% with a maximum error of 0.26%.
Again, these errors are due to interpolation between charts data points.
Iz Option Evaluation
The Iz option is an option for the
evaluation of :
If Iz = 1, is constant and computed during Starter at
time = 0 and; therefore is not updated each cycle.
If Iz = 2, is not constant (R(t)) and; thus is updated for each cycle during Engine
computation only before the wave reaches the surface. After, no update is
done.
To evaluate Iz, a displacement is
imposed from (point C) to (point D) and the detonation is launched after the
displacement.
For Iz = 1, since is constant and is evaluated at time = 0, the pressure () obtained should correspond to , even after the displacement.
For Iz = 2, is updated as at each cycle; therefore, the pressure () obtained should correspond to after the displacement.
Table 4. Iz
Evaluation for Point B
Iz =
expected (Mbar)
Radioss (Mbar)
Error (%)
1
8.70e-4
8.71e-4
0.01%
2
4.27e-4
4.26e-4
0.14%
Conclusion
This study highlights that the /LOAD/PBLAST option behaves as
expected with Exp_data = 2, for every value of
Ishape.
Be aware of the importance of the units used in the
/BEGIN card
A TNT-equivalent must be used
Minor variations between the charts and Radioss
outputs