Evaluation of the /LOAD/PBLAST option for free air burst blast
waves. This analysis focuses on evaluating the /LOAD/PBLAST keyword by
comparing Radioss results with experimental data on free-air
bursts (Exp_data = 1).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the UFC quantities evaluation
model Figure 2. Formula evaluation model
The analysis is carried out using two models:
A single 2D element /SHELL with /PROP/TYPE1
(SHELL), to which a Rigid Body is attached, and correctly
positioned for a given scaled distance.
Nineteen 2D elements /SHELL with /PROP/TYPE1
(SHELL), with a Rigid Body attached to all of them, correctly
positioned at the same scaled distance, each rotated by an angle of 10 degree in succession.
Since the experimental data (UFC charts) use the unit system {cm, g, µs}, this study
is conducted using the same unit system.
The free air burst corresponds to a blast wave model characterized by spherical wave
propagation, without ground reflection (as shown in the animation below).Figure 3. House model (spherical propagation)
Here the scaled distance (cm/g1/3):
Where,
Distance from the center of the detonation charge to the target
(cm)
TNT-equivalent mass (g)
The scaled distance suggests that two charges with the same geometry, explosive
composition, and ambient conditions will generate self-similar blast waves if their
scaled distances match.Figure 4. Equivalence of blast wave
This allows the pressure to be computed from experimental data for a given charge () and a given location ().
The equation used to compute the pressure in /LOAD/PBLAST is the
modified Friedlander equation:
The profile of the modified Friedlander equation at a given location is:Figure 5. Friedlander pressure profile
Where,
The impulses (the integral of pressure with respect to time in the time
interval ).
The propagation time of the blast wave from the charge to the
target.
In Radioss, the negative phase is ignored and is replaced by a value (defaults to 10-20). In this case,
and until the end of this study, the pressure is described only by:
which replaces .
which replaces .
which replaces .
and vanish.
is still the same
Figure 6. Blast wave pressure profile implemented in Radioss
The blast pressure computed in /LOAD/PBLAST is fitted using
experimental data (UFC charts) which are categorized in two quantities:
The incident wave referred to as the “side on” wave (abbreviation: so), , where the captor/surface normal is
perpendicular to the direction of the blast wave.
The reflected wave , where the captor/surface normal points
towards the blast wave.
These two quantities result in the following formula for the pressure applied to the
surface:
Figure 7. Angle schematic
Where, is the angle between the surface normal and the direction
of the detonation point.
This corresponds to the measurement data obtained with the measuring instruments (UFC
charts).
Previously, was introduced as the integral of the pressure with
respect to time (positive or negative phase). The same process is applied to and , with the impulses denoted by and . In the charts, and are introduced as the impulse divided by ; the same applies to and .Figure 8. Free air burst quantities graph
Model Description
The boundary conditions are represented below:Figure 9. All boundary conditions applied to the first model Figure 10. All boundary conditions applied to the second
model
The two models are tested with 2D shell elements using the /PROP/TYPE1
(SHELL) property and the /MAT/LAW1 (ELASTIC)
material, with a rigid body attached. The elements are placed at distance of from the detonation point ( is imposed).
Shell and material properties:
Properties
Value
Density
7.8 g/cm3
Young's modulus
2.1 Mbar
Poisson ratio
0.3
Thickness
1 cm
The first goal is to compare , , , , and and compare UFC charts and Radioss outputs. To achieve this, is imposed and only is varied. The second goal is to evaluate formula
Equation 3 for every 10 degrees from 0 degrees to 180 degrees for
different values.
Results
Points Considered
The UFC quantities are evaluated for every point listed below. The formula (Equation 3) is evaluated for Points B, D and H:
Table 1. List of Points Considered
Point
(cm)
(g)
(g.cm-1/3)
A
39.6850263
500000
0.5
B
79.3700526
500000
1
C
396.850263
500000
5
D
793.700526
500000
10
E
1984.251315
500000
25
F
3968.50263
500000
50
G
5952.753945
500000
75
H
7937.00526
500000
100
I
9921.256575
500000
125
J
11905.50789
500000
150
K
13889.7592
500000
175
L
15874.01052
500000
200
M
17858.26183
500000
225
N
19842.51315
500000
250
O
21826.76446
500000
275
P
23811.01578
500000
300
Q
25795.26709
500000
325
R
27779.51841
500000
350
S
29763.76972
500000
375
T
31748.02104
500000
400
U
57.54328813
500000
0.725
V
158.7401052
500000
2
W
253.9841683
500000
3.2
X
1269.920842
500000
16
Y
2936.691946
500000
37
Z
111.1180736
500000
1.4
AA
555.5903682
500000
7
UFC Quantities Evaluation
For each point in the table, , , , and are measured from the pressure profile on the 2D
shell elements.Figure 11. evaluation Figure 12. evaluation Figure 13. evaluation Figure 14. evaluation Figure 15. evaluation
The maximum error obtained is 3.82% on for = 0.5 and the average error across all data is
0.06%.
These errors are due to interpolation between charts data points.
Formula Evaluation
For point B, D and H, the formula is evaluated every 10 degrees from 0 degree to 180
degrees:
Figure 16. Formula evaluation for point B Figure 17. Formula evaluation for point D Figure 18. Formula evaluation for point H
The average error obtained is 0.04% with a maximum error of 0.10%.
Again, these errors are due to interpolation between charts data points.
Iz Option Evaluation
The Iz option is an option for the
evaluation of :
If Iz = 1, is constant and computed during Starter at
time = 0 and; therefore, is not updated each cycle.
If Iz = 2, is not constant () and; thus is updated for each cycle during Engine
computation.
To evaluate Iz, a displacement is
imposed from (point B) to (point V) and the detonation is launched after the
displacement.
For Iz = 1, since is constant and is evaluated at time = 0, the pressure () obtained should correspond to , even after the displacement.
For Iz = 2, is updated as at each cycle; therefore, the pressure () obtained should correspond to after the displacement.
Table 2. Iz
Evaluation
Iz =
expected (Mbar)
Radioss (Mbar)
Error (%)
1
3.68E-03
3.68E-03
0.01%
2
1.58E-03
1.57E-03
0.28%
Conclusion
This study highlights that the /LOAD/PBLAST option behaves as
expected with Exp_data = 1.
Be aware of the importance of the units used in the
/BEGIN card
A TNT-equivalent must be used
Minor variations between the charts and Radioss
outputs